Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the model used for extracting candidate pairs #3

Open
z-kun opened this issue Jan 31, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

About the model used for extracting candidate pairs #3

z-kun opened this issue Jan 31, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@z-kun
Copy link

z-kun commented Jan 31, 2018

Hello jpeyre,
I have read your paper and program, it is a nice idea to import spatial features to visual relation detection.

After reading, I confuse the sentence "To detect and localize such triplets in test images, we assume that the candidate object detections for s and o are given by a de- tector trained with full supervision. Here we use the object detector Faster-RCNN [14] trained on the Visual Relationship Detection training set [31]." in Part 3 of this paper. But, in the section Representing Appearance of Objects, you use Fast-RCNN with VGG16 pre-trained on ImageNet to extract the appearance feature. So you mean that you use the same CNN structure(Fast-RCNN) trained on different datasets in these two different steps?

I just find the "vgg16_fast_rcnn.caffemodel" in the program, but do not find the model trained on Visual Relationship Dataset. I wonder if I misunderstand the paper. Could you tell me some details about the model trained on VRD used for extracting the candidate pairs of objects? Thank you!

@jpeyre
Copy link
Owner

jpeyre commented Jan 31, 2018

Hi z-kun,
We use the same model both for extracting the candidate objects and computing their appearance features. This model is indeed "vgg16_fast_rcnn.caffemodel", a VGG16 network pre-trained on ImageNet and finetuned on the VRD training set.

@z-kun
Copy link
Author

z-kun commented Jan 31, 2018

get it, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants