-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consistent accuracy for number display #6
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
@hope-data-science I agree with you. I found the issue in the # Load library
library(ggplate)
#> 📊 Welcome to ggplate version 0.0.1! 📈
#>
#> 🖍 Have fun plotting your data! 💻
# Load data
data("data_continuous_96")
# Numeric values
data_continuous_96$Value
#> [1] 1.19 0.88 0.17 0.85 0.78 0.23 1.95 0.40 0.88 0.26 1.47 3.04 0.05 0.97 0.90
#> [16] 0.02 2.06 1.01 0.92 1.66 0.12 0.41 1.70 0.24 0.26 2.12 0.17 0.83 0.75 0.25
#> [31] 0.62 0.28 1.36 0.18 0.04 0.03 1.71 0.41 0.35 1.24 1.82 1.17 0.33 0.51 0.23
#> [46] 0.41 0.33 2.73 1.00 0.47 0.05 0.17 0.08 0.67 1.40 0.35 1.05 0.62 1.82 0.10
#> [61] 0.50 0.07 0.20 0.67 0.63 1.65 0.64 0.38 0.87 1.68 1.41 0.98 0.36 0.50 0.65
#> [76] 0.03 1.51 0.37 0.11 0.10 0.39 0.07 0.84 0.41 1.13 0.83 1.11 0.19 0.64 0.32
#> [91] 0.51 1.64 0.85 0.32 1.12 0.91
# Problem when converted to character
paste0(data_continuous_96$Value)
#> [1] "1.19" "0.88" "0.17" "0.85" "0.78" "0.23" "1.95" "0.4" "0.88" "0.26"
#> [11] "1.47" "3.04" "0.05" "0.97" "0.9" "0.02" "2.06" "1.01" "0.92" "1.66"
#> [21] "0.12" "0.41" "1.7" "0.24" "0.26" "2.12" "0.17" "0.83" "0.75" "0.25"
#> [31] "0.62" "0.28" "1.36" "0.18" "0.04" "0.03" "1.71" "0.41" "0.35" "1.24"
#> [41] "1.82" "1.17" "0.33" "0.51" "0.23" "0.41" "0.33" "2.73" "1" "0.47"
#> [51] "0.05" "0.17" "0.08" "0.67" "1.4" "0.35" "1.05" "0.62" "1.82" "0.1"
#> [61] "0.5" "0.07" "0.2" "0.67" "0.63" "1.65" "0.64" "0.38" "0.87" "1.68"
#> [71] "1.41" "0.98" "0.36" "0.5" "0.65" "0.03" "1.51" "0.37" "0.11" "0.1"
#> [81] "0.39" "0.07" "0.84" "0.41" "1.13" "0.83" "1.11" "0.19" "0.64" "0.32"
#> [91] "0.51" "1.64" "0.85" "0.32" "1.12" "0.91"
# Corrected output
paste0(format(data_continuous_96$Value, drop0Trailing = F))
#> [1] "1.19" "0.88" "0.17" "0.85" "0.78" "0.23" "1.95" "0.40" "0.88" "0.26"
#> [11] "1.47" "3.04" "0.05" "0.97" "0.90" "0.02" "2.06" "1.01" "0.92" "1.66"
#> [21] "0.12" "0.41" "1.70" "0.24" "0.26" "2.12" "0.17" "0.83" "0.75" "0.25"
#> [31] "0.62" "0.28" "1.36" "0.18" "0.04" "0.03" "1.71" "0.41" "0.35" "1.24"
#> [41] "1.82" "1.17" "0.33" "0.51" "0.23" "0.41" "0.33" "2.73" "1.00" "0.47"
#> [51] "0.05" "0.17" "0.08" "0.67" "1.40" "0.35" "1.05" "0.62" "1.82" "0.10"
#> [61] "0.50" "0.07" "0.20" "0.67" "0.63" "1.65" "0.64" "0.38" "0.87" "1.68"
#> [71] "1.41" "0.98" "0.36" "0.50" "0.65" "0.03" "1.51" "0.37" "0.11" "0.10"
#> [81] "0.39" "0.07" "0.84" "0.41" "1.13" "0.83" "1.11" "0.19" "0.64" "0.32"
#> [91] "0.51" "1.64" "0.85" "0.32" "1.12" "0.91" Created on 2023-11-09 with reprex v2.0.2 |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have seen the following plot in README, and I wonder whether we can keep a consistent accuracy, which means the "1" should be "1.00", and "1.4" should be "1.40" (I myself use scales package and yields similar results, and in many cases this should be adjusted). Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: