Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

increase highest possible Q value to comply with Aviti high quality data #28

Open
splaisan opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@splaisan
Copy link

splaisan commented Jul 12, 2024

Dear John,

When I run ngmerge on Element Biosciences Aviti data I get the error

Error! Quality scores outside of set range

This is due to the extra quality of the Element Biosciences Aviti which exceeds the classical 0:40 range for Illumina data
Could it please add code to ignore all Qvalues 40+ and set them instead to 40 or enlarge the authorised range to match Aviti data (up to 56! https://docs.elembio.io/docs/bases2fastq/outputs/#quality-scores).

I am now parsing my fastq and downgrading Qvalues to 40 but it would be better to fix NGmerge instead as Aviti is there to stay.

I see a file ngmerge.h with large matrices but do not know what to do with them to add scores up to at least 46 which is my highest measured value on the current data.

Thanks in advance

@jsh58
Copy link
Owner

jsh58 commented Jul 15, 2024

I believe this has been addressed before in #4

@splaisan
Copy link
Author

Thanks @jsh58 ,
There is indeed info there but as for building new tables from Aviti data, the explanations in your manuscript are far from enough, even with the provided python scripts.
A full tutorial, including R commands would be necessary in order to reproduce this published data.
Could you by any chance share such a full command code so that I can run it on aviti data (we have phiX reads in sequences obtained from Illumina libraries) and produce new tables?
If I succeed in this, I will be happy to contribute the resulting tables here.
Thanks in advance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants