Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jujubundlelib 0.5.2 has requirement PyYAML==3.11, but you have PyYAML 3.12 #45

Closed
simonklb opened this issue Jan 6, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed
Labels
priority/low low priority

Comments

@simonklb
Copy link
Contributor

simonklb commented Jan 6, 2017

$ pip check
No broken requirements found.
$ pip install juju
Collecting juju
Collecting pyyaml (from juju)
Collecting python-dateutil (from juju)
  Using cached python_dateutil-2.6.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl
Collecting theblues (from juju)
Collecting websockets (from juju)
  Using cached websockets-3.2-py33.py34.py35-none-any.whl
Collecting six>=1.5 (from python-dateutil->juju)
  Using cached six-1.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl
Collecting jujubundlelib>=0.4.1 (from theblues->juju)
Collecting requests>=2.1.1 (from theblues->juju)
  Using cached requests-2.12.4-py2.py3-none-any.whl
Installing collected packages: pyyaml, six, python-dateutil, jujubundlelib, requests, theblues, websockets, juju
Successfully installed juju-0.1.2 jujubundlelib-0.5.2 python-dateutil-2.6.0 pyyaml-3.12 requests-2.12.4 six-1.10.0 theblues-0.3.8 websockets-3.2
$ pip check
jujubundlelib 0.5.2 has requirement PyYAML==3.11, but you have PyYAML 3.12.
@simonklb
Copy link
Contributor Author

simonklb commented Jan 6, 2017

I suspect this is the issue: pypa/pip#988

Anyone know of a reason the bundle lib needs that specific version though?

@tvansteenburgh
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know why jujubundlelib has pinned to pyyaml 3.11, but generally speaking a library shouldn't do that - it should be left to the application to pin specific versions of dependencies.

You can probably resolve this by pinning to pyyaml 3.11 in your app's requirements.

@simonklb
Copy link
Contributor Author

simonklb commented Jan 6, 2017

Perhaps it could be pinned here until it's fixed in the bundle lib. So that others won't have to face the same issue as well. Up to you!

@seman
Copy link

seman commented Jan 6, 2017

This also causes an issue for CWR #67

@arosales arosales added priority/low low priority and removed wontfix labels Feb 23, 2017
@brainwane
Copy link

Regarding the pip dependency resolver: please try the beta of the new resolver in pip 20.2 and see whether that helps?

@brainwane
Copy link

pip 20.3 has the new dependency resolver on by default; please see the documentation on how to test and migrate in case it helps you address this problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority/low low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants