Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Norm1 and NormInf, the great debate #578

Closed
IainNZ opened this issue Sep 5, 2015 · 10 comments
Closed

Norm1 and NormInf, the great debate #578

IainNZ opened this issue Sep 5, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@IainNZ
Copy link
Collaborator

IainNZ commented Sep 5, 2015

Perhaps unsurprisingly, someone tried to use these and they didn't work. I think to implement them could require disabling hot starts (due to the complexity of mapping between MPB indices and the original JuMP problem), and would be another complexity increase (but how much I'm not sure)

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

Why don't we implement this first as an extension and see how it works?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Sep 6, 2015

I'm very much against adding ad-hoc transformations like this. We're going to end up with a huge increase in complexity and a DCP-ish syntax that isn't as useful or consistent as Convex.jl. Either we do full DCP or we don't.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

(Let's do full DCP)

@IainNZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

IainNZ commented Sep 6, 2015

Taste the rainbow

@IainNZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

IainNZ commented Sep 6, 2015

I like it being in a little JuMP tools package though

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Sep 6, 2015

JuDCP?

@iamed2
Copy link
Contributor

iamed2 commented Nov 6, 2015

Is this a thing that went forward?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Nov 6, 2015

Not at all, should probably close this as too speculative

@IainNZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

IainNZ commented Dec 14, 2015

I made a start at this in https://github.com/IainNZ/JuMPTools.jl

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Nov 22, 2016

No reason to leave this open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants