Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatically Supplied Datapoints (for booleans and enum types) #109

Closed
MatrixFrog opened this issue Jun 3, 2010 · 4 comments · Fixed by #654
Closed

Automatically Supplied Datapoints (for booleans and enum types) #109

MatrixFrog opened this issue Jun 3, 2010 · 4 comments · Fixed by #654
Labels

Comments

@MatrixFrog
Copy link

This is a feature that NUnit (the testing framework for .NET) has and JUnit appears not to have.

http://nunit.org/index.php?p=datapoint&r=2.5.5

"Automatically Supplied Datapoints

It is normally not necessary to specify datapoints for boolean or enum arguments. Beginning with version 2.5.4, NUnit automatically supplies values of true and false for boolean arguments and will supply all defined values of any enumeration.

If for some reason you don't wish to use all possible values, you can override this behavior by supplying your own datapoints. If you supply any datapoints for an argument, automatic datapoint generation is suppressed."

@djh82
Copy link
Contributor

djh82 commented Jun 5, 2012

Similar to #10

@dsaff
Copy link
Member

dsaff commented Nov 27, 2012

I think there's a very good argument to be made for auto-supplying booleans and enums, either optionally or by default.

dsaff referenced this issue Mar 19, 2013
Autogenerated datapoints for boolean and enum parameters
@UrsMetz
Copy link
Contributor

UrsMetz commented Jul 29, 2014

@MatrixFrog @dsaff looking at issue #654 this issue should be fixed and could be closed, I think.

@kcooney
Copy link
Member

kcooney commented Jul 29, 2014

Good point. Thanks!

@kcooney kcooney closed this as completed Jul 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants