-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Analyse time clusters #63
Comments
Re-hello EyetrackingR, Update that might help with figuring out the source of the problem: I just ran analyse time clusters on the data set provided with eyetrackingR and I got the following error - Error in Thanks again, |
Hey @MonicaBarbir , Can you provide the code for a reproducible example? Thanks! |
Hi everyone, I'm having the same issue so I'm just going to add it here rather than open a new one. There are a couple issues with
I'm not totally sure I understand the use of If you want my data to run the code on it, you can find it on my experiment's GitHub repository. You need to open the |
I also encountered this issue and found that the problem had to do with specifying the make_time_sequence_data function. In my case, both "condition" and "participant" were wrongly included in the "summarize_by" argument. Moving "condition" to the "predictor_columns" argument cleared up the issue for me. Hope this helps you too! Example in code: WRONG: CORRECT: |
Hello Eyetracking R,
I am having some problems analysing time clusters. I get the following error in the script that had worked a couple days ago:
Error in .subset2(x, i, exact = exact) :
recursive indexing failed at level 2
I have recently updated Eyetracking R, and other necessary packages such as Dplyr. Since having the problem, I've gone about updating every package just in case, but to no avail.
I had had a similar problem before, but it had worked out when I downgraded Dplyr (which I believe cannot do now, because the new version of Eyetracking R requires the new version of Dplyr).
Any ideas what it may be caused by?
Thank you,
Monica
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: