Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 3, 2022. It is now read-only.

tesseract engine (v 3.03) not found #9

Closed
jwilk opened this issue Feb 2, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

tesseract engine (v 3.03) not found #9

jwilk opened this issue Feb 2, 2014 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@jwilk
Copy link
Member

jwilk commented Feb 2, 2014

Issue reported by anonymous at Bitbucket:

Hi!

ocrodjvu 0.7.16 does not find tesseract, installed in /usr/local/bin. I am using a svn version (r1037) of tesseract 3.03 which is able to output information using the -psm 0 option, on an ubuntu 12.04.3 64bit machine.
I had similar Problems with the ocrodjvu package for Ubuntu 12.04 (version 0.7.7) with tesseract 3.01., but 0.7.16 was able to detect older tesseract versions.

~$ ocrodjvu --list-engines
cuneiform
gocr
ocrad
$ which tesseract
/usr/local/bin/tesseract

I created a symbolic link /usr/bin/tesseract as well, but without success

$ tesseract -v
tesseract 3.03
 leptonica-1.70
  libgif 4.1.6(?) : libjpeg 8b : libpng 1.2.46 : libtiff 4.0.3 : zlib 1.2.3.4 : webp 0.4.0

Regards -
Heinrich Schwietering

@jwilk
Copy link
Member Author

jwilk commented Feb 2, 2014

Comment submitted by heinrich_schwietering at Bitbucket:

Minor correction: tesseract in version 3.02 is found by ocrodjvu (by mistake I wrote 3.01 above).

Moving the new tesseract-executable (3.03) to /usr/bin wasn't successful either.

Regards - Heinrich Schwietering

@jwilk
Copy link
Member Author

jwilk commented Feb 2, 2014

Where can I download Tesseract 3.03?

https://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ links only to 3.02, and there's
no 3.02 in the svn repository either.

Jakub Wilk

@jwilk
Copy link
Member Author

jwilk commented Feb 2, 2014

Comment submitted by heinrich_schwietering at Bitbucket:

Hi!
I used tesseract svn r1037, and compiled it. tesseract -v gave the information I posted above: 3.03

@jwilk
Copy link
Member Author

jwilk commented Feb 2, 2014

Hopefully should be fixed in 83c86b8.

@jwilk
Copy link
Member Author

jwilk commented Feb 3, 2014

Comment submitted by heinrich_schwietering at Bitbucket:

It is! Thanks!

@jwilk
Copy link
Member Author

jwilk commented Feb 4, 2014

Fixed in 0.7.17.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant