Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
42 lines (31 loc) · 1.88 KB

kmonad_comparison.md

File metadata and controls

42 lines (31 loc) · 1.88 KB

Comparison with kmonad

The kmonad project is the closest alternative for this project. It is also more mature and has had many more contributions than kanata.

Benefits of kmonad over kanata

  • MacOS support
  • Different features

Why I built and use kanata

Limitations that don't affect me:

  • I only use Windows and Linux (PRs for MacOS support are welcome though!)
  • My personal layout in QMK is fully replicable with the keyberon library's features

Why I don't use kmonad:

The issues listed are all fixable in kmonad and I hope they are one day! For me though, I don't know Haskell well enough to poke around the kmonad codebase and attempt fixing these. That's why I instead built kanata based off of the excellent work that had already gone into the keyberon, ktrl, and kbremap projects.

If you want to see which features are supported in kanata, the sample configuration and features list in the README should hopefully provide insight.

I dogfood kanata myself and it works great for my use cases. If you don't use any of the missing features from kmonad or are willing to part with them (or implement them), give kanata a try!