You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As you might already know: guide-key does only show me "??" instead of any useful hint.
Is it possible to adopt guide-key so that it shows the first X characters of an existing docstring? In the example above, this would be "foobar" (instead of "??").
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, guide-key get key bindings to parse the result of describe-buffer-bindings, so guide-key has only command name and doesn't have its definition. It's a very poor behavior.
I'll plan to modify this behavior and get command definitions in a proper way.
Please wait until its modification.
Hi!
I really do love guide-key! Thanks for this great piece of software.
However, I do have a number of commands which were defined like the following:
As you might already know: guide-key does only show me "??" instead of any useful hint.
Is it possible to adopt guide-key so that it shows the first X characters of an existing docstring? In the example above, this would be "foobar" (instead of "??").
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: