Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BptreeMap can drop invalid objects if clone panics #55

Closed
ammaraskar opened this issue Feb 25, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #56
Closed

BptreeMap can drop invalid objects if clone panics #55

ammaraskar opened this issue Feb 25, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #56

Comments

@ammaraskar
Copy link

Hi there, we (Rust group @sslab-gatech) are scanning crates on crates.io for potential soundness bugs. We noticed a panic safety issue in the BptreeMapWriteTxn::insert function.

If a key being inserted panics during its clone then it can leave the BptreeMap in an inconsistent state and cause invalid objects to be dropped.

See this example:

#![forbid(unsafe_code)]

use concread::bptree::BptreeMap;

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
struct DropDetector(u32);

impl Clone for DropDetector {
    fn clone(&self) -> Self {
        panic!("Panic on clone!");
    }
}

impl Drop for DropDetector {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        println!("Dropping {}", self.0);
    }
}

fn main() {
    let tree : BptreeMap<DropDetector, i32> = BptreeMap::new();
    let mut writer = tree.write();

    writer.insert(DropDetector(1), 1);
    writer.commit();

    let mut writer = tree.write();
    writer.insert(DropDetector(0), 0);
}

which outputs:

thread 'main' panicked at 'Panic on clone!', src/main.rs:25:9
stack backtrace:
   0: std::panicking::begin_panic
             at /home/ammar/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:505
   1: <rudra_poc_0156::DropDetector as core::clone::Clone>::clone
             at ./src/main.rs:25
   2: concread::bptree::node::Leaf<K,V>::req_clone
             at /home/ammar/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/concread-0.2.8/src/bptree/node.rs:589
   3: concread::bptree::cursor::clone_and_insert
             at /home/ammar/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/concread-0.2.8/src/bptree/cursor.rs:630
   4: concread::bptree::cursor::CursorWrite<K,V>::insert
             at /home/ammar/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/concread-0.2.8/src/bptree/cursor.rs:250
   5: concread::bptree::BptreeMapWriteTxn<K,V>::insert
             at /home/ammar/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/concread-0.2.8/src/bptree/mod.rs:301
   6: rudra_poc_0156::main
             at ./src/main.rs:43
   7: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
             at /home/ammar/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
Dropping 32659
Dropping 0
Dropping 1

Notice the weird Dropping 32659 indicating some uninitialized or re-used memory is being dropped.

@Firstyear
Copy link
Member

I think the fix here won't be "too bad". In theory we could also panic on keys too not just the values.

https://github.com/kanidm/concread/blob/master/src/bptree/node.rs#L578

We present the metadata count as we clone, but similar to the link, we could mask this out in the copy, and then update the count after.

This probably also affects branches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants