You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the word definition, instead of having images it could have a geo: link for the approximate centre of the area, and specify a zoom level. e.g. lower zoom if we are talking country names, higher zoom for cities and towns.
Then when the word is taught instead of showing an image it can emded an OpenStreetMap map of the area. A new challenge type to ask 'where is (placename)?' and also 'Which of these is (placename)?' while showing 3 or 4 of the map areas and getting the learner to pick which one it is.
This would allow teaching of not only place names compared to their English counterpart, but also where they are on the map.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Skivling
changed the title
Way to teach names for geographic areas by linking to a map
[Feature Request] Way to teach names for geographic areas by linking to a map
Jul 28, 2024
Sounds like a good idea, but I would say only if we can implement it in such a way that it can be implemented in built time: that is the client software should not need to be aware of the distinction between this and other images. Otherwise it would increase the required complexity to build a client by a lot. So basically it would work like an "image generator script"
In the word definition, instead of having images it could have a
geo:
link for the approximate centre of the area, and specify a zoom level. e.g. lower zoom if we are talking country names, higher zoom for cities and towns.Then when the word is taught instead of showing an image it can emded an OpenStreetMap map of the area. A new challenge type to ask 'where is (placename)?' and also 'Which of these is (placename)?' while showing 3 or 4 of the map areas and getting the learner to pick which one it is.
This would allow teaching of not only place names compared to their English counterpart, but also where they are on the map.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: