Skip to content

GoogleChromeLabs/chrome-devrel-review-bot

Repository files navigation

reviewbot

Automated reviews of web.dev/developer.chrome.com pull requests.

Deploying

  1. Go to https://glitch.com/edit/#!/reviewbot.
  2. Click Tools > Import and Export > Import from GitHub.
  3. Enter the name of the repository (e.g. GoogleChromeLabs/chrome-devrel-review-bot) and click OK.

Make sure that the Glitch app is boosted so that it is already running when it receives POST messages from GitHub and will be able to respond quickly.

Development/debugging

Follow these instructions if you want to develop/debug reviewbot locally.

  1. Create a test pull request (PR) that triggers the conditions you want to develop/debug.

  2. Create an .env file and add the following values:

    GITHUB=…
    PSI=…
    PORT=8080
    DEV=true
    PR=…
    ORG=…
    REPO=…
    

    GITHUB should be the GitHub API key for reviewbot. PSI should be reviewbot's PageSpeed Insights API key. The values for GITHUB and PSI are available on Google's internal system for sharing passwords (search for reviewbot). PR is the number of the pull request that you want to test. ORG is the organization/user that owns the repository. REPO is the repository. For example, given a pull request URL like https://github.com/googlechrome/web.dev/pull/688, googlechrome is the organization/user, web.dev is the repository, and 688 is the pull request number.

  3. Run npm run dev.

  4. Navigate to localhost:8080 (replace 8080 with whatever value you provided for PORT in .env).

Since reviewbot is a GitHub webhook bot, the production version of reviewbot really only uses/listens for POST messages. Therefore we can use GET messages for debugging/development purposes. That's what the workflow above does. In other words when you load localhost:8080 from a browser, the GET listener in server.js is triggered. And that listener is purely for debugging/development. The GET listener basically just audits a single, specific PR (the one that you specify in .env) and then returns the results as JSON. So you can look at the JSON results of the audit in your browser.

Every time that you reload localhost:8080, the auto-generated comment that gets posted to the GitHub pull request will also get updated. Look for the text THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT BUILD OF REVIEWBOT to make sure that the comment was generated from your development build, not the production build of reviewbot. On that note, keep in mind that the production build is always running, so it's possible for the production build to interfere with your development build if you dramatically change the code.

Architecture overview

This section explains the lifecycle of the bot.

  1. A pull request (PR) is created or updated.
  2. GitHub sends a POST message to reviewbot.glitch.me. This happens because we have set up a webhook from the web.dev repository to this URL.
  3. The POST handler in server.js receives the events from GitHub.
  4. The POST handler routes the event data to bot.js. We only act on a few relevant events, such as a PR being created, a comment being updated, etc.
  5. bot.js gathers the source code files associated to the PR.
  6. bot.js only proceeds if the PR is creating or updating Markdown files.
  7. bot.js runs audits on the Markdown files. All of the audits are handled in audits/markdown.js. Right now we're only using a Markdown linter. In the future we'll probably want to do other analyses on the Markdown, such as checking for incorrect words.
  8. bot.js creates a comment summarizing the results of the analysis. The comment also contains direct links to the new or updates pages for the author's convenience.
  9. As the PR is updated, the comment is replaced with new information (rather than creating new comments, which could get spammy). We detect the old comment by looking for a unique string embedded within the comment (it's an HTML comment).

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published