bpf: Change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()

This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.

Fixes: 981f94c ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127022507.23674-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn

Author: Menglong Dong

kernel/bpf/disasm.c

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
 				insn->dst_reg,
 				insn->off, insn->src_reg);
 		else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
-			 (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
+			 (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
 			  insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
 				insn->code,