You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of having one prediction per variant, for phased data we know which variants are on the same DNA strand and therefore we can combine these in one single alternative sequence per chromosome copy.
Since this requires phased variants, an issue arises when these are mixed with non-phased variants.
From previous discussions, there are basically three ways to handle them:
Ignore non-phased data, only throw a warning
Assign them to a random strand
Estimate strand with e.g. linkage disequilibrium
We concluded that the user should make sure that his data is correctly phased and therefore option 1) is the most straightforward solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Instead of having one prediction per variant, for phased data we know which variants are on the same DNA strand and therefore we can combine these in one single alternative sequence per chromosome copy.
Since this requires phased variants, an issue arises when these are mixed with non-phased variants.
From previous discussions, there are basically three ways to handle them:
We concluded that the user should make sure that his data is correctly phased and therefore option 1) is the most straightforward solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: