You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
The autograder is very thorough when grading, so it produces a lot of annotations.
There can be 100+ annotations for a submission, which is a challenge for a student to review.
It becomes more likely that the student does not see important feedback or does not look through them all, which is unfortunate.
There are some lints that make sense to group like
use format strings ("%d%s".formatted(number, string)),
non-descriptive constant names
unused code
but there are other lints like common reimplementation or use different visibility that provide individual suggestions for specific code and therefore would loose a lot of value by merging them.
A potential solution should therefore conditionally group annotations
Describe the solution you'd like
The simplest solution I can think of, is to do the following:
The autograder emits for each annotation an id (could be a number).
Before submitting, the grading tool will
count all annotations with the same id
if there are more than for example 5 with the same id
the first 4 are kept as is and the remaining are merged into one annotation
the annotation could look like this: "The identifier 'intField4' should not contain its type in the name. Other problems in L7, L8, L9, L10, L11."
Describe alternatives you've considered
The autograder merges lints for now, but this results in a few problems:
false-positives made by the autograder are harder to find, because they might be hidden in a message and not marked in the code.
one might think that some pieces have been forgotten by the autograder (because they are not marked)
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The autograder is very thorough when grading, so it produces a lot of annotations.
There can be 100+ annotations for a submission, which is a challenge for a student to review.
It becomes more likely that the student does not see important feedback or does not look through them all, which is unfortunate.
There are some lints that make sense to group like
"%d%s".formatted(number, string)
),but there are other lints like common reimplementation or use different visibility that provide individual suggestions for specific code and therefore would loose a lot of value by merging them.
A potential solution should therefore conditionally group annotations
Describe the solution you'd like
The simplest solution I can think of, is to do the following:
The autograder emits for each annotation an id (could be a number).
Before submitting, the grading tool will
"The identifier 'intField4' should not contain its type in the name. Other problems in L7, L8, L9, L10, L11."
Describe alternatives you've considered
The autograder merges lints for now, but this results in a few problems:
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: