Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On-cluster build: Pipeline triggered automatically by an action on GitHub #858

Closed
Tracked by #620
lance opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 8 comments · Fixed by #1594
Closed
Tracked by #620

On-cluster build: Pipeline triggered automatically by an action on GitHub #858

lance opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 8 comments · Fixed by #1594
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@lance
Copy link
Member

lance commented Feb 22, 2022

No description provided.

@lance lance mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2022
29 tasks
@lance lance moved this to Icebox (backlog and controversial items) in Func Roadmap Apr 6, 2022
@lance lance moved this from Icebox (backlog and controversial items) to In Design (typically large tasks with a feature track) in Func Roadmap Apr 6, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 24, 2022
@zroubalik
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 25, 2022
@lance lance added this to the 0.99.0 Release milestone Jul 28, 2022
@lance lance modified the milestones: 0.99.0 Release, 1.0.0 Release Sep 14, 2022
@lance lance moved this from In Design to Next in Func Roadmap Sep 20, 2022
@lance lance modified the milestones: 1.8.0 Release, 1.9.0 Release Oct 4, 2022
@lance
Copy link
Member Author

lance commented Oct 4, 2022

@jrangelramos do I recall correctly that you have a POC implementation for this?

@lance
Copy link
Member Author

lance commented Oct 4, 2022

This is probably a tutorial instead of an implementation

@jrangelramos
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @lance No. I had a POC when loading source code from user machine (without Git)

@lance
Copy link
Member Author

lance commented Oct 4, 2022

Hi @lance No. I had a POC when loading source code from user machine (without Git)

Ahh that's right. Thanks for the reminder.

@lance lance moved this to ✏ In Design in Functions WG Roadmap Oct 6, 2022
@lance lance moved this from ✏ In Design to ❄ Icebox in Functions WG Roadmap Oct 18, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 3, 2023
@zroubalik
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 3, 2023
@lance lance modified the milestones: 1.9.0 Release, Release 1.10 Feb 14, 2023
@zroubalik zroubalik self-assigned this Mar 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Next to In Design in Func Roadmap Mar 7, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from ❄ Icebox / Backlog to ✅ Done in Functions WG Roadmap Mar 7, 2023
@lance lance moved this from In Design to Done in Func Roadmap May 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants