We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
By @tobiasdiez
https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/85acd73acbf94265a2816f5243f7f5fd917b3ed3/src/main/java/org/jabref/logic/bibtex/FieldContentParser.java#L30
Please extract these fields that should be treated as multilines to InternalBibtexFields (or a better location). Moreover, a few places still work with https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/733da312471c3abab691d61eccee061962357e1c/src/main/java/org/jabref/model/entry/FieldName.java#L107 instead of comments. This should be changed too.
InternalBibtexFields
comments
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
By @tobiasdiez
https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/85acd73acbf94265a2816f5243f7f5fd917b3ed3/src/main/java/org/jabref/logic/bibtex/FieldContentParser.java#L30
Please extract these fields that should be treated as multilines to
InternalBibtexFields(or a better location). Moreover, a few places still work with https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/733da312471c3abab691d61eccee061962357e1c/src/main/java/org/jabref/model/entry/FieldName.java#L107 instead ofcomments. This should be changed too.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: