You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A look at the results of the benchmarks shows that the JVM-based languages pay a heavy price in terms of memory consumption, a significant part of it being probably due to the JIT kicking in. It is why I would like to suggest running the tests written in these languages with the Substrate VM, i.e. compile them to native binaries with the "native-image" command that accompanies the Graal VM.
I don't suggest dropping the current JVM tests, but rather add to them Substrate VM tests.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A look at the results of the benchmarks shows that the JVM-based languages pay a heavy price in terms of memory consumption, a significant part of it being probably due to the JIT kicking in. It is why I would like to suggest running the tests written in these languages with the Substrate VM, i.e. compile them to native binaries with the "native-image" command that accompanies the Graal VM.
I don't suggest dropping the current JVM tests, but rather add to them Substrate VM tests.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: