-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 699
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Manage Pods directly instead of using Job controllers #325
Comments
Hi, folks, I will pick up this if nobody working on this :) |
that would be great! |
Awesome! And I think it is hard to decouple #314 and this issue 🤔 Would you file one PR for these two issues together? |
Just FYI: @kow3ns and I have been noodling on the idea of a stateful Job that would benefit TF Training Operator. Managing pods outside of existing curated controllers is a risky proposition IMHO, but might be a good stop gap solution. |
This PR is a part of kubeflow#325: rename jobName() to genName() create Pod instead of Job TODOs (in another PR): use controller.PodControlInterface and CreatePodsWithControllerRef to create Pod Listen Pod CRUD and update TFJob status which descried in kubeflow#314
@ScorpioCPH #344 is merged. Can we close this? Or is there more work to be done? |
/close |
Consensus in #45 was that we should manage the pods directly. Opening this issue to track that work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: