-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request for v21.0.0-legacy/v22.0.0-legacy Support #3866
Comments
Hello Team, |
I just kicked off a patch release for We'll see about future versions, it is painful to have to carry both versions indefinitely, and Java8 is on the path to EOL quite soon. |
And fwiw, this vulnerability doesn't impact this library, given how we use proto buffers (and also given that most users use JSON not proto for communications w/ the API server) |
IIRC something is wrong with the author info for the generated commits from the workflow. I think we can tentatively suppress that error by using our personal github email to author the generated commits.. if that sounds good to you, i can edit the workflow accordingly |
the last run failed due to invalid input.. triggering a new one now |
@brendandburns The retry workflow failed again due to incorrect pom version on |
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.kubernetes/client-java/21.0.2-legacy |
@yue9944882 we're going to need to manually update the POMs since sending PRs from a Github action is still broken :( |
Yea the workflow is failing because we disabled GH action's write permission from the package.. |
To make this automated by workflow again, I will think we can do:
I will try reach out to the sig-contribex folks for more info.. |
I ended up setting up then publishing 22.0.0-legacy from my forked repo due to the permission issue:
|
Hello,
With the changes in client-java-api version 20.0.0, certain features are not backward-compatible, and Java8 support has been dropped. For developers still using Java8, would it be possible to release a v21.0.0-legacy/v22.0.0-legacy version?
This would help those of us unable to switch to newer Java versions immediately.
Thank you for considering this request!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: