Real number and last round of wordsmithing.

Signed-off-by: Flynn <emissary@flynn.kodachi.com>

Author: kflynn

geps/x.md geps/gep-2014.md

@@ -1,20 +1,24 @@
 # GEP-X: Declarative Policy
 
-* Issue: TODO
+* Issue: [2014](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/issues/2014)
 * Status: Provisional
+* Authors: [Flynn](mailto:flynn@buoyant.io); [Shane Utt](mailto:shane@konghq.com)
 
 ## Definitions
 
-In this document we'll use `Policy` to refer to things that are specifically called policies
-as well as other "MetaResources" that follow similar patterns.
+In this document we'll use `policy` to refer to any resource whose purpose is
+setting policy around other resources. Notably, this could include either
+"policies" or "metaresources" as used in other documents: we're intentionally
+using the broader scope here.
 
-## TLDR
+## tl;dr:
 
-This proposal is a follow-up to [GEP-713 Metaresources and Policy Attachment][713] to recommend
-that we specifically remove the "attachment" part of "policy attachment" in favor of something
-that is declarative at the affected resource level.
+This proposal is a follow-up to [GEP-713 Metaresources and Policy Attachment]
+to recommend that we specifically remove the "attachment" part of "policy
+attachment" in favor of something that is declarative at the affected resource
+level.
 
-[713]:https://gateway-api.sigs.k8s.io/geps/gep-713/
+[GEP-713 Metaresources and Policy Attachment]:https://gateway-api.sigs.k8s.io/geps/gep-713/
 
 ## Goals
 
@@ -23,6 +27,10 @@ that is declarative at the affected resource level.
 - Provide new semantics to incorporate `Policy` resources at the level of the `Resource` that
   will be affected.
 
+## Non-Goals
+
+- To be clarified
+
 ## The Problem: A Parable of Jane
 
 It's a sunny Wednesday afternoon, and the lead microservices developer for
@@ -157,20 +165,26 @@ Given that the fundamental problem is that policy attachement isn't
 declarative as written and should be made declarative, there is only one
 fundamental answer: we need to modify the Kubernetes core resources to include
 extension points where a given object refers to its modifier, rather than
-having the modifying resource try to attach to its source. This is an ugly
-job, but it’s the only way to deal with this situation.
+having the modifying resource try to attach to its source. (For the record, we
+take no joy in this statement, but we do feel that it's the correct answer.)
 
 This GEP proposes to start this process with the Gateway API resources.
 
+A final note: while it's important to acknowledge that policy attachment is
+**not** the root cause of the application problems that Jane and Julian have
+in the parable above, it's also important to recognize that policy attachment
+makes understanding and fixing the problem much more difficult. That's the
+primary concern behind this GEP.
+
 ## API
 
 TODO: future iteration
 
 ## Questions and Answers
 
-**Q**: _Why are you implying that there’s a problem with policy attachment?
-Isn’t your parable really just showing us that Jane and Julian work for a
-dysfunctional organization?_
+**Q**: _Isn’t your parable really just showing us that Jane and Julian work
+for a dysfunctional organization, rather than showing anything wrong with
+policy attachment?_
 
 **A**: As written, Evil Genius Cupcakes is _far_ from the most dysfunctional
 organization I’ve seen. Jane and Julian support each other, neither casts