Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document best practices on LB configuration(s). #3607

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
timothysc opened this issue May 2, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Document best practices on LB configuration(s). #3607

timothysc opened this issue May 2, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

This is a...

  • Feature Request
  • Bug Report

Problem:
Missing documentation on best practices for LB configurations.

Proposed Solution:

  • Leverage /healthz endpoint in LB configs settings.

  • Encourage LBs leverage (source) settings to ensure cache hits.

    • Over the course of several years, the api-server has started to maintain larger and larger caches, encouraging source will leverage those caches more effectively. (We should metrics hit %s honestly)
  • Update connection timeouts to their highest possible settings as this can lead to expensive relists.

  • Internal and External LBs.

    • Traffic isolation, cache hits, and external LB's don't need such a high TTL.

Page to Update:
TODO

@jamiehannaford
Copy link
Contributor

@timothysc I can work on this (feel free to assign). I'm a bit unclear on #2, what type of apiserver caching are you referring to? Do you expect the LB to handle content caching or the apiserver?

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 26, 2017
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 25, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants