You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:
When running s390x e2e tests, uses tinycore image which is not supported on s390x
Describe the solution you'd like:
label tinycore tests so we can exclude them explicitly from s390x e2e test suite
Describe alternatives you've considered:
currently we use a work-around which is to use a regex in the manual ginkgo test call to exclude tinycore image; it's preferable to have it explicitly labelled; considered building tinycore image for s390x but that would be a bigger and external project with more permissions required.
Additional context:
only applies to s390x architecture.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right on the CDI side we are only interested in the bytes being written from the source to the target. We don't even know about VMs or what they are in CDI. If there are failures on s390x in the CDI test suite there is some other reason.
The tests were balking at using the image provided, but it looks like @Davo911 has built an image that the s390x CDI will recognize and move around now -- he's trying to get it to start up busybox or get a shell running in it (since it's just the kernel plus some basic tools at its simplest) anyway. But yah we could use an s390x formatted VM for the tests that are there now, even if it doesn't boot or bring up a shell.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:
When running s390x e2e tests, uses tinycore image which is not supported on s390x
Describe the solution you'd like:
label tinycore tests so we can exclude them explicitly from s390x e2e test suite
Describe alternatives you've considered:
currently we use a work-around which is to use a regex in the manual ginkgo test call to exclude tinycore image; it's preferable to have it explicitly labelled; considered building tinycore image for s390x but that would be a bigger and external project with more permissions required.
Additional context:
only applies to s390x architecture.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: