Who is using echo in production?

[plar]

Issue Description

I just want to hear which companies are using echo in production.

[constantins2001]

I don't believe many companies as it seems to be broken quite often with many regressions (sadly).
(See #1461)

[Gregory-Ledray]

I do for a small website with routing and middleware. As with any open source software, there are a bunch of features in Echo which are not used by the people who created the software and probably have poor regression tests associated with them. IMO if it's not shown in an example on labstack's website you should not assume the functionality works without writing your own test.

[lammel]

We are using echo for mission critical software making use of the proxy middleware (including websockets), jwt middleware, logging, recover, bigcache, prometheus...

Rock solid in production and extremely fast on restarts. We are pretty happy with our decission to go with echo.

For development we had to get our hands dirty a bit from time to time and provide a PR here and there (usually for the router) which was merged pretty fast.

Of course it is open source software and it is free (as in beer), so you cannot expect that others test your scenario and make every upgrade smooth as butter.

[rodzy]

From what I know IBM uses it for their cloud section, some other enterprises are just catching up with this kind of frameworks, but its actually pretty cool that some of them aim for Echo, from my experience it's one the best out there and the easiest to catch up.
I found some info on who uses echo here https://stackshare.io/echo

[andrei-dascalu]

We're currently using it in production for an experimental API with HTTP/2 and currently integrating it in a set of microservices exposing websockets.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.