-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
how to improve the perfromance of agents to get better responses from the local model like gpt4all #9506
Comments
🤖 To enhance the performance of agents for improved responses from a local model like gpt4all in the context of LangChain, you can adjust several parameters in the
Here is an example of how you can adjust these parameters: from langchain import PromptTemplate, LLMChain
from langchain.llms import GPT4All
from langchain.callbacks.streaming_stdout import StreamingStdOutCallbackHandler
# Callbacks support token-wise streaming
callbacks = [StreamingStdOutCallbackHandler()]
# Verbose is required to pass to the callback manager
llm = GPT4All(model="./models/ggml-gpt4all-l13b-snoozy.bin", backend="gptj", callbacks=callbacks, verbose=True, n_threads=8, n_predict=256, temp=0.7, top_p=0.1, top_k=40, repeat_penalty=1.18)
prompt = PromptTemplate(template="Question: {question}\n\nAnswer: Let's think step by step.", input_variables=["question"])
llm_chain = LLMChain(prompt=prompt, llm=llm) Please note that the actual performance improvement depends on the specific requirements of your application and may require further fine-tuning of these parameters. In addition to this, you can also use the For more details, you can refer to the following sources:
I hope this helps! If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Sources
This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research. Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant. If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot. |
from load_data import load_document, split_documents from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI ###############Load parameters from YAML file llm = ChatOpenAI(openai_api_key= params['openai_api_key']) csv_file_path = params['csv_file_path'] data = load_document(csv_file_path) documents = split_documents(data) vector_store = generate_embeddings(documents, embedding_model) ##########prompt template
context : {context} now based on above context answer the question accurately: Question: {question} Answer: """ def generate_prompt(prompt_template1): def load_qa_chain_model(model_type, prompt_template): ####memory ####QA_chain ####creating custom tacit db_tool def track_lang_model(question, model_gen_answer, prompt_template, llm, duration): ####Intialize agent template = generate_prompt(prompt_template1) llm, chain_type = load_qa_chain_model(model, template) answer = call_agent_func(vector_store,llm, chain_type, question, prompt_template1) print(answer) ##########################3 output -
It is failing badly. |
@ dosu-bot |
🤖 Hello, To make the bot answer a question using your current setup, you can use the Here's a simplified example of how you can do this: # Define your question
question = "Your question goes here"
# Use the vector store to find the most relevant document for the question
query_embedding = llm.encode(question) # Generate an embedding for the question
_, document_indices = vector_store.search(query_embedding, k=1) # Find the most relevant document
# Get the most relevant document
relevant_document = documents[document_indices[0]]
# Use the ChatOpenAI instance to generate an answer based on the relevant document
chat_messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": prompt_template1},
{"role": "user", "content": question},
{"role": "assistant", "content": relevant_document},
]
response = llm.predict(chat_messages)
# The response will be a list of message objects, you can extract the assistant's reply like this:
assistant_reply = response[-1]['content']
print(assistant_reply) In this example, Please note that this is a simplified example and the actual implementation may vary depending on the specifics of your setup. For example, you might want to consider using a more sophisticated method for selecting the most relevant document, or you might want to use a different method for generating the answer based on the relevant document. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions. Sources
This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research. Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant. If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot. |
Hey @Kuramdasu-ujwala-devi 👋, great question! You should definitely checkout Infino's callback to monitor and improve the LLM performance. Link to docs here. Please feel free to reach out in case of any issues. |
Hi, @Kuramdasu-ujwala-devi! I'm Dosu, and I'm here to help the LangChain team manage our backlog. I wanted to let you know that we are marking this issue as stale. From what I understand, the issue is about finding ways to enhance the performance of agents in order to obtain improved responses from local models like gpt4all. There have been some helpful suggestions provided by me and "naman-modi". I recommended adjusting parameters in the Based on these suggestions, it seems that the issue has been resolved. The adjustments to the parameters in the Before we close this issue, we wanted to check with you if it is still relevant to the latest version of the LangChain repository. If it is, please let us know by commenting on the issue. Otherwise, feel free to close the issue yourself or it will be automatically closed in 7 days. Thank you for your contribution to the LangChain repository! Let us know if you have any further questions or concerns. |
how to improve the perfromance of agents to get better responses from the local model like gpt4all
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: