We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal is to add an attribute to AIMessage:
AIMessage
reasoning?: MessageContent;
See discussion on Slack (https://langchaincommunity.slack.com/archives/C07EHF3HC87/p1737150066310499) and discussion in #7434 and #7564
cc: @jacoblee93
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are going to put reasoning_content in additional_kwargs for now but will upgrade the schema in the future:
reasoning_content
additional_kwargs
#7604
Sorry, something went wrong.
@jacoblee93 - What is the format of reasoning_content? Whatever the model returns or should we be defining a specific type?
For now whatever the model defines (Deepseek makes it a string)
Would imagine in the future it'll be content blocks or string but would prefer to wait for the dust to settle a bit
No branches or pull requests
Privileged issue
Issue Content
Proposal is to add an attribute to
AIMessage
:See discussion on Slack (https://langchaincommunity.slack.com/archives/C07EHF3HC87/p1737150066310499) and discussion in #7434 and #7564
cc: @jacoblee93
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: