Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upstream Requirements for MOI Migration #280

Closed
6 of 8 tasks
ccoffrin opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed
6 of 8 tasks

Upstream Requirements for MOI Migration #280

ccoffrin opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
JuMP v0.19 Issues to do after MOI migration
Milestone

Comments

@ccoffrin ccoffrin added the JuMP v0.19 Issues to do after MOI migration label May 10, 2018
@chriscoey
Copy link

also jump-dev/Pavito.jl#7

@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member Author

@ccoffrin ccoffrin changed the title MOI Migration Upstream Requirements for MOI Migration Aug 16, 2018
@ccoffrin ccoffrin added this to the JuMP v0.19 milestone Aug 16, 2018
@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member Author

At some point it will also be important to discuss the following points,

  • the use of the with_optimizer pattern and how it make require PowerModels users to explicitly import JuMP
  • will it be possible to specify solvers at the optimize! call, or should they always be provided at JuMP model instantiation

@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member Author

These discussion points were addressed in a recent JuMP-Dev phone call. with_optimizer can be exported by PowerModels to make it cleaner for users. Solvers can be provided at the time of the optimize! call.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
JuMP v0.19 Issues to do after MOI migration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants