DevStack is written in UNIX shell script. It uses a number of bash-isms and so is limited to Bash (version 4 and up) and compatible shells. Shell script was chosen because it best illustrates the steps used to set up and interact with OpenStack components.
DevStack's official repository is located on git.openstack.org at https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack. Besides the master branch that tracks the OpenStack trunk branches a separate branch is maintained for all OpenStack releases starting with Diablo (stable/diablo).
Contributing code to DevStack follows the usual OpenStack process as described in How To Contribute in the OpenStack wiki. DevStack's LaunchPad project contains the usual links for blueprints, bugs, etc.
The Gerrit review queue is used for all commits.
The primary script in DevStack is stack.sh
, which performs the bulk of the
work for DevStack's use cases. There is a subscript functions
that contains
generally useful shell functions and is used by a number of the scripts in
DevStack.
A number of additional scripts can be found in the tools
directory that may
be useful in supporting DevStack installations. Of particular note are info.sh
to collect and report information about the installed system, and install_prereqs.sh
that handles installation of the prerequisite packages for DevStack. It is
suitable, for example, to pre-load a system for making a snapshot.
The DevStack repo generally keeps all of the primary scripts at the root level.
doc
- Contains the Sphinx source for the documentation.
A complete doc build can be run with tox -edocs
.
extras.d
- Contains the dispatch scripts called by the hooks in
stack.sh
, unstack.sh
and clean.sh
. See :doc:`the plugins
docs <plugins>` for more information.
files
- Contains a variety of otherwise lost files used in
configuring and operating DevStack. This includes templates for
configuration files and the system dependency information. This is also
where image files are downloaded and expanded if necessary.
lib
- Contains the sub-scripts specific to each project. This is
where the work of managing a project's services is located. Each
top-level project (Keystone, Nova, etc) has a file here. Additionally
there are some for system services and project plugins. These
variables and functions are also used by related projects, such as
Grenade, to manage a DevStack installation.
samples
- Contains a sample of the local files not included in the
DevStack repo.
tests
- the DevStack test suite is rather sparse, mostly consisting
of test of specific fragile functions in the functions
and
functions-common
files.
tools
- Contains a collection of stand-alone scripts. While these
may reference the top-level DevStack configuration they can generally be
run alone. There are also some sub-directories to support specific
environments such as XenServer.
DevStack scripts should generally begin by calling env(1)
in the shebang line:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
Sometimes the script needs to know the location of the DevStack install directory.
TOP_DIR
should always point there, even if the script itself is located in
a subdirectory:
# Keep track of the current DevStack directory. TOP_DIR=$(cd $(dirname "$0") && pwd)
Many scripts will utilize shared functions from the functions
file. There are
also rc files (stackrc
and openrc
) that are often included to set the primary
configuration of the user environment:
# Keep track of the current DevStack directory. TOP_DIR=$(cd $(dirname "$0") && pwd) # Import common functions source $TOP_DIR/functions # Import configuration source $TOP_DIR/openrc
stack.sh
is a rather large monolithic script that flows through from beginning
to end. It has been broken down into project-specific subscripts (as noted above)
located in lib
to make stack.sh
more manageable and to promote code reuse.
These library sub-scripts have a number of fixed entry points, some of which may
just be stubs. These entry points will be called by stack.sh
in the
following order:
install_XXXX configure_XXXX init_XXXX start_XXXX stop_XXXX cleanup_XXXX
There is a sub-script template in lib/templates
to be used in creating new
service sub-scripts. The comments in <>
are meta comments describing
how to use the template and should be removed.
In order to show the dependencies and conditions under which project functions
are executed the top-level conditional testing for things like is_service_enabled
should be done in stack.sh
. There may be nested conditionals that need
to be in the sub-script, such as testing for keystone being enabled in
configure_swift()
.
stackrc
is the global configuration file for DevStack. It is responsible for
calling local.conf
(or localrc
if it exists) so local user configuration
is recognized.
The criteria for what belongs in stackrc
can be vaguely summarized as
follows:
- All project repositories and branches handled directly in
stack.sh
- Global configuration that may be referenced in
local.conf
, i.e.DEST
,DATA_DIR
- Global service configuration like
ENABLED_SERVICES
- Variables used by multiple services that do not have a clear owner, i.e.
VOLUME_BACKING_FILE_SIZE
(nova-compute and cinder) orPUBLIC_NETWORK_NAME
(only neutron but formerly nova-network too) - Variables that can not be cleanly declared in a project file due to dependency ordering, i.e. the order of sourcing the project files can not be changed for other reasons but the earlier file needs to dereference a variable set in the later file. This should be rare.
Also, variable declarations in stackrc
before local.conf
is sourced
do NOT allow overriding (the form
FOO=${FOO:-baz}
); if they did then they can already be changed in local.conf
and can stay in the project file.
The DevStack repo now contains all of the static pages of devstack.org in
the doc/source
directory. The OpenStack CI system rebuilds the docs after every
commit and updates devstack.org (now a redirect to docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack).
All of the scripts are processed with shocco to render them with the comments
as text describing the script below. For this reason we tend to be a little
verbose in the comments _ABOVE_ the code they pertain to. Shocco also supports
Markdown formatting in the comments; use it sparingly. Specifically, stack.sh
uses Markdown headers to divide the script into logical sections.
The script used to drive <code>shocco</code> is <code>tools/build_docs.sh</code>. The complete docs build is also handled with <code>tox -edocs</code> per the OpenStack project standard.
DevStack defines a bash set of best practices for maintaining large collections of bash scripts. These should be considered as part of the review process.
DevStack uses the bashate style checker to enforce basic guidelines, similar to pep8 and flake8 tools for Python. The list below is not complete for what bashate checks, nor is it all checked by bashate. So many lines of code, so little time.
- lines should not include trailing whitespace
- there should be no hard tabs in the file
- indents are 4 spaces, and all indentation should be some multiple of them
- then should be on the same line as the if
- do should be on the same line as the for
Example:
if [[ -r $TOP_DIR/local.conf ]]; then LRC=$(get_meta_section_files $TOP_DIR/local.conf local) for lfile in $LRC; do if [[ "$lfile" == "localrc" ]]; then if [[ -r $TOP_DIR/localrc ]]; then warn $LINENO "localrc and local.conf:[[local]] both exist, using localrc" else echo "# Generated file, do not edit" >$TOP_DIR/.localrc.auto get_meta_section $TOP_DIR/local.conf local $lfile >>$TOP_DIR/.localrc.auto fi fi done fi
- functions should be used whenever possible for clarity
- functions should use
local
variables as much as possible to ensure they are isolated from the rest of the environment - local variables should be lower case, global variables should be upper case
- function names should_have_underscores, NotCamelCase.
- functions should be declared as per the regex ^function foo {$ with code starting on the next line
There are some broad criteria that will be followed when reviewing your change
Is it passing tests -- your change will not be reviewed thoroughly unless the official CI has run successfully against it.
Does this belong in DevStack -- DevStack reviewers have a default position of "no" but are ready to be convinced by your change.
For very large changes, you should consider :doc:`the plugins system <plugins>` to see if your code is better abstracted from the main repository.
For smaller changes, you should always consider if the change can be encapsulated by per-user settings in
local.conf
. A common example is adding a simple config-option to anini
file. Specific flags are not usually required for this, although adding documentation about how to achieve a larger goal (which might include turning on various settings, etc) is always welcome.Work-arounds -- often things get broken and DevStack can be in a position to fix them. Work-arounds are fine, but should be presented in the context of fixing the root-cause of the problem. This means it is well-commented in the code and the change-log and mostly likely includes links to changes or bugs that fix the underlying problem.
Should this be upstream -- DevStack generally does not override default choices provided by projects and attempts to not unexpectedly modify behavior.
Context in commit messages -- DevStack touches many different areas and reviewers need context around changes to make good decisions. We also always want it to be clear to someone -- perhaps even years from now -- why we were motivated to make a change at the time.
Reviewers -- please see
MAINTAINERS.rst
for a list of people that should be added to reviews of various sub-systems.
Changes to Devstack are tested by automated continuous integration jobs that run on a variety of Linux Distros using a handful of common configurations. What this means is that every change to Devstack is self testing. One major benefit of this is that developers do not typically need to add new non voting test jobs to add features to Devstack. Instead the features can be added, then if testing passes with the feature enabled the change is ready to merge (pending code review).
A concrete example of this was the switch from screen based service management to systemd based service management. No new jobs were created for this. Instead the features were added to devstack, tested locally and in CI using a change that enabled the feature, then once the enabling change was passing and the new behavior communicated and documented it was merged.
Using this process has been proven to be effective and leads to quicker implementation of desired features.