You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, dear friends:
I think in the paper the author wanted to convey an idea that we should upsample the embedded feature maps to the same size as labels in order to calculate the loss. However, in the source code, it seems that it downsamples the labels as the same size as embedded faeture maps to calculate the loss. It confuses me, could you please tell me how it goes like this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, dear friends:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/56212320/194202322-dc40a26e-a6c2-4028-9123-3a0d6200716e.png)
I think in the paper the author wanted to convey an idea that we should upsample the embedded feature maps to the same size as labels in order to calculate the loss. However, in the source code, it seems that it downsamples the labels as the same size as embedded faeture maps to calculate the loss. It confuses me, could you please tell me how it goes like this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: