-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Service names #68
Service names #68
Conversation
@diasdavid had to make changes to the tests, please review them. Also, how to add AppVeyor CI? |
test/multicast-dns.spec.js
Outdated
* This test is WRONG. Peers are async. How can you assume | ||
* that the mdnsA.stop happens before mdnsC gets a response | ||
* from mdnsA? | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@richardschneider wanna fix the test then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about it and could not come up with a test. How does one prove that something will not happen?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can stop and wait "two intervals" to make sure that indeed no more broadcasts happen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
@diasdavid RTM |
@richardschneider Hi! There is ongoing work on mDNS API for browser extensions and Is there a technical reason why this change was done, or was it just pure aesthetics? :)
Problem I: Problem II: go version seems to be using See mozilla/libdweb#7 (comment) for more details. cc @jacobheun |
@lidel MDNS does not require DNS-SD nor does DNS-SD require MDNS. However, they can work togther. I was wrong to use DNS-SD also requires a SRV and TXT resource record and expects A and/or AAAA records. |
@richardschneider If we can comply with DNS-SD then we should, as it makes it more interoperable with how things work in Firefox and other tools. I was going to PR to fix this, but not sure what value should we switch to. |
Let's move this discussion over to libp2p/libp2p#28. The current consensus is |
_ipfs-discovery._udp
toipfs