You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Verify GPMSA works correctly on Bayes linear verification problem due to Brian Williams and add regression test if possible.
Example is from
[1] Adams, B.M., Coleman, Kayla, Hooper, Russell W., Khuwaileh, Bassam A., Lewis, Allison, Smith, Ralph C., Swiler, Laura P., Turinsky, Paul J., Williams, Brian J., "User Guidelines and Best Practices for CASL VUQ Analysis Using Dakota, Sandia Technical Report 2016-11614 (also CASL-U-2016-1233-000), September 2016.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the course of doing this, I noticed that (I think) the GPMSA test and examples are scaling simulation and experiment data by variance instead standard deviation. If that's the case and not right, I can prepare a commit to adjust that...
Yeah, that appears to be the case to me too, and that's not right. Good catch! I apparently copy-and-pasted the scalar example code without reading nearly closely enough.
Verify GPMSA works correctly on Bayes linear verification problem due to Brian Williams and add regression test if possible.
Example is from
[1] Adams, B.M., Coleman, Kayla, Hooper, Russell W., Khuwaileh, Bassam A., Lewis, Allison, Smith, Ralph C., Swiler, Laura P., Turinsky, Paul J., Williams, Brian J., "User Guidelines and Best Practices for CASL VUQ Analysis Using Dakota, Sandia Technical Report 2016-11614 (also CASL-U-2016-1233-000), September 2016.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: