Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

for your information: other uses of binary xml #11

Closed
williballenthin opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

for your information: other uses of binary xml #11

williballenthin opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@williballenthin
Copy link

over at williballenthin/python-evtx#42 there's an interesting request for a parser for the EVTX log entries queried via RPC. notably, this API returns a binary blob per event record. while the blob header is different from the EVTX record header, its obvious most of the binary XML format is shared. perhaps at your convenience, you might also be interested in reviewing this data.

for example, since records are transmitted independently, strings and templates seem to be placed in-line, rather than defined in a shared location. i think there are a few flags in the node headers which dictate this; however, i'm still exploring.

i'm not expecting anything from you here --- just passing along the pointer.

@joachimmetz
Copy link
Member

joachimmetz commented Aug 15, 2017

@williballenthin thx, yes I was aware of this since I ran into "[MS-EVEN6]: EventLog Remoting Protocol Version 6.0"

per http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc231282(v=prot.10).aspx

Specifies the EventLog Remoting Protocol Version 6.0 protocol, which exposes RPC methods for reading events in both live and backup event logs on remote computers. 

Most of the binary xml functionality has therefore been moved to https://github.com/libyal/libfwevt

@joachimmetz
Copy link
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants