We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(see [@fig:figure1])
with
pandoc -s -f markdown -t json Test.md | pandoc-crossref --pipe latex | tee Test.json | pandoc -s -f json -t latex Test.tex
Output: Test.json
"blocks": [ { "t": "Para", "c": [{ "t": "Str", "c": "(see" }, { "t": "Space" }, { "t": "Str", "c": "fig. 1)" }] } ],
replaces the reference directly with fig. 1, why is that behavior different from (should be the same behavior according to pandoc)
fig. 1
pandoc -s -f markdown -t latex -F pandoc-crossref Test.md > Test.tex
where its replaced correctly with \cref. What I am doing wrong?
\cref
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Try invoking with pandoc-crossref latex --pipe. It seems there's a bug in option parser somewhere, which I will try to fix sometime next week.
pandoc-crossref latex --pipe
Sorry, something went wrong.
See https://github.com/gabyx/TechnicalMarkdown/blob/master/output-tex/input.pdf works like a charm, but the setup is a lot of fiddling trying to put together the best parts.
No branches or pull requests
with
Output: Test.json
replaces the reference directly with
fig. 1
, why is that behavior different from (should be the same behavior according to pandoc)pandoc -s -f markdown -t latex -F pandoc-crossref Test.md > Test.tex
where its replaced correctly with
\cref
. What I am doing wrong?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: