feat: wallet management v2 #69
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Addminus I have the same issue with switching chains with the new implementation
|
|
Related Should be fixed in the next MetaMask extension release 🙂 |
chybisov
commented
Apr 18, 2023
Comment on lines
70
to
87
| {installedWallets.map((wallet: Wallet) => ( | ||
| <ListItemButton | ||
| key={wallet.name} | ||
| onClick={() => handleConnect(wallet)} | ||
| > | ||
| <ListItemAvatar> | ||
| <Avatar | ||
| src={(wallet.icon as any).src || wallet.icon} | ||
| alt={wallet.name} | ||
| > | ||
| {wallet.name[0]} | ||
| </Avatar> | ||
| </ListItemAvatar> | ||
| <ListItemText primary={wallet.name} /> | ||
| </ListItemButton> | ||
| ))} | ||
|
|
||
| {notInstalledWallets.map((wallet: Wallet) => ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can probably merge these arrays and map through one. 🙂
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Accidentally merged previous PR 😅
@Addminus please check comments from the previous one #67