Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lightning Specification Meeting 2021/09/27 #916

Closed
6 of 19 tasks
t-bast opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
6 of 19 tasks

Lightning Specification Meeting 2021/09/27 #916

t-bast opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator

t-bast commented Sep 23, 2021

The meeting will take place on Monday 2021/09/27 at 8pm UTC on Libera Chat IRC #lightning-dev. It is open to the public.

Pull Request Review

Long Term Updates

Backlog

The following are topics that we should discuss at some point, so if we have time to discuss them great, otherwise they slip to the next meeting.

@t-bast t-bast pinned this issue Sep 23, 2021
@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator Author

t-bast commented Sep 23, 2021

As usual, don't hesitate to submit topics, or ask to reorder - we have many pending PRs and it's hard to judge which ones folks find more interesting.

@joostjager
Copy link
Collaborator

For the topics for which there is no preference, maybe it works to apply some kind of deterministic scheduling. For example "shortest diff first" or "longest time since last discussed first".

To increase the chances of getting things done without adding any personal preference.

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator Author

t-bast commented Sep 24, 2021

I'm not sure any kind of deterministic scheduling makes sense, in my opinion we should only discuss what most people are interested in (otherwise most people will just stay silent during the meeting). I'd like to see people push for the topics they're interested in, and that should give enough data to decide what topics should be prioritized.

Ideally that means many people should vote for what topics they're interested in before the meeting, and then we'd sort them by interest. Unfortunately people tend to have too many things on their plate and not enough time to prepare before the meeting. Or maybe we're just not using the right tools, and if we had a very simple way of voting for topics people would do it beforehand? If people want to chime in on that, I'd like to have some feedback.

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator Author

t-bast commented Sep 27, 2021

Actually thinking about this more, we don't need to add new processes to get this end result.
We can get satisfying results if:

  • the meeting chair changes often enough to reflect every team regularly
  • the meeting chair takes meeting items in the order that she's interested in (instead of the order listed in this issue)

I think we're mostly good on the first point, but no-one does the second one yet.

To all future meeting chairs: don't hesitate to do it! If you're chair, you get to chose what we discuss! That's an effective way to ensure we cover varying topics.

@t-bast t-bast unpinned this issue Oct 18, 2021
@t-bast t-bast closed this as completed Oct 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants