Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to MonitorUpdatingPersister #441

Open
tnull opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Switch to MonitorUpdatingPersister #441

tnull opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@tnull
Copy link
Collaborator

tnull commented Jan 23, 2025

Especially since we now added remote storage via VSS, we should aim to reduce the persisted data and switch to use MonitorUpdatingPersister.

@arturgontijo
Copy link

arturgontijo commented Jan 29, 2025

Hey @tnull, is anybody working on this one?

It looks like a low hanging fruit from that v0.6 issues list. Am I right?
Asking as I'm very new to this codebase =).

Edit: Does this make sense?

@tnull
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tnull commented Jan 31, 2025

Hey @tnull, is anybody working on this one?

It looks like a low hanging fruit from that v0.6 issues list. Am I right? Asking as I'm very new to this codebase =).

No, currently nobody is actively working on this. Feel free to give it a shot, although I'm not sure it's the best first issue as it requires some prior knowledge around LDK's interface usage.

Edit: Does this make sense?

I think this generally goes in the right direction, but note that we'll need to use the MonitorUpdatingPersister as the Persist implementation we give to ChainMonitor at the very least.

@arturgontijo
Copy link

Ok, will give it a try...if things don't go smoothly I'll ping you guys on Discord =)
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants