Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to bypass the camel-casing of properties? #130

Closed
daveyarwood opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Is it possible to bypass the camel-casing of properties? #130

daveyarwood opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@daveyarwood
Copy link

daveyarwood commented Apr 18, 2023

Hello! Thank you for Helix, it's fantastic. 🙌

I'm trying to add a custom, kebab-cased logical-id property on various elements in our UI for testing purposes, but I discovered that if the element is a native one, Helix automatically converts the names of all of its properties into camel-case.

Is it possible to opt out of this behavior, at least for certain properties, or on a per-element basis? Or do you have any other thoughts on how to address this? I cannot change the name of the property, as we are already using kebab-case in our tests.

@daveyarwood
Copy link
Author

Potentially related to #9.

@lilactown
Copy link
Owner

For test IDs and other custom attributes that you don't want to be munged, you can prefix data- to the beginning and it should not be camelCased. E.g.

(d/button {:data-testid "foo-button"} "Foo")

See

(defn camel-case
for reference, above it is a regex with other prefixes that don't get camelCased - at the moment aria- and -- attributes.

Hope that helps!

@daveyarwood
Copy link
Author

In our case, the trouble is that the tests are expecting certain elements to be identified with the property logical-id, not e.g. data-logical-id.

@lilactown
Copy link
Owner

Maybe a silly question, but could you change the tests? AFAIK best practices for DOM testing is to use data- attributes, see https://docs.cypress.io/guides/references/best-practices#Selecting-Elements and https://testing-library.com/docs/queries/bytestid/.

The usage of data attributes for this is to ensure that future changes to the DOM spec don't end up changing the behavior of the elements you've attached the attributes to. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Howto/Use_data_attributes

I can think about other fixes for this, but in general it will behoove you to store and lookup this type of information in data- attributes.

@daveyarwood
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the information, this is helpful!

We would prefer to avoid renaming the attributes, since we are already using the non-data-prefixed version in a ton of places, but we could do it if we have to.

We might also be able to work around this by using non-native elements (e.g. MUI Box), since the properties are passed through unchanged for those.

@lilactown
Copy link
Owner

ebe00d0 allows string keys to be used to pass props to DOM elements verbatim. E.g.

(d/button {"logical-id" "foo"} "Foo")

This will go out in the next release. You're welcome to use it via git deps for now.

However, again, I would strongly encourage you to migrate your tests to use data- attributes, as it is industry best practice to do so and guarantees that your tests won't break in subtle ways later. Assuming this application (and tests) will live on for years, it's probably worth the investment now to do so.

Either way, thanks for the report! I'll close this for now. If you do try out the string keys functionality and you find any bugs, please open another issue.

@daveyarwood
Copy link
Author

That all sounds good - thanks for the fast response!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants