Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NumericExtensions not working on julia-0.5? #64

Open
nbecker opened this issue Sep 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

NumericExtensions not working on julia-0.5? #64

nbecker opened this issue Sep 14, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@nbecker
Copy link

nbecker commented Sep 14, 2016

julia> using NumericExtensions: logsumexp
INFO: Precompiling module ArrayViews.
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{ArrayViews.UnsafeContiguousView})(Ptr{#T<:Any}, Int64, Tuple{Vararg{Int64, #N<:Any}}) in module ArrayViews at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/ArrayViews/src/arrviews.jl:18 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/ArrayViews/src/arrviews.jl:26.
WARNING: symbol is deprecated, use Symbol instead.
in symbol(::String, ::Vararg{Any,N}) at ./deprecated.jl:30
in default_functorsym(::Symbol) at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:39
in @functor2a(::Any, ::Any) at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:54
in eval_user_input(::Any, ::Base.REPL.REPLBackend) at ./REPL.jl:64
in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:95 [inlined]
in (::Base.REPL.##3#4{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:68
while loading /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl, in expression starting on line 139
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{NumericFuns.BesseliFun})(##335#OT<:Real) in module NumericFuns at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:71 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:73.
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{NumericFuns.BesseljFun})(##340#OT<:Real) in module NumericFuns at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:71 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:73.
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{NumericFuns.BesselkFun})(##345#OT<:Real) in module NumericFuns at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:71 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:73.
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{NumericFuns.BesselyFun})(##350#OT<:Real) in module NumericFuns at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:71 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:73.
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{NumericFuns.Hankelh1Fun})(##355#OT<:Real) in module NumericFuns at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:71 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:73.
WARNING: Method definition (::Type{NumericFuns.Hankelh2Fun})(##360#OT<:Real) in module NumericFuns at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:71 overwritten at /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericFuns/src/functors.jl:73.
WARNING: could not import Base.add! into NumericExtensions
ERROR: LoadError: LoadError: MethodError: no method matching Union(::Type{DenseArray{T,1}}, ::Type{DenseArray{T,2}})
Closest candidates are:
Union{T}(::Any) at sysimg.jl:53
in eval_user_input(::Any, ::Base.REPL.REPLBackend) at ./REPL.jl:64
in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:95 [inlined]
in (::Base.REPL.##3#4{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:68
while loading /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericExtensions/src/common.jl, in expression starting on line 5
while loading /home/nbecker/.julia/v0.5/NumericExtensions/src/NumericExtensions.jl, in expression starting on line 116

@ngiann
Copy link

ngiann commented Nov 4, 2016

Same here, on Julia 0.5.

@RoyiAvital
Copy link

Is this package still relevant?

@s-celles
Copy link

s-celles commented Nov 6, 2017

I also wonder that.
I was looking for functors and found
https://github.com/lindahua/NumericFuns.jl/
but Julia 0.6 support is also broken
see lindahua/NumericFuns.jl#9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants