Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not consider atoms in protein instead of amino acid? #5

Open
dxyzx0 opened this issue Nov 4, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Why not consider atoms in protein instead of amino acid? #5

dxyzx0 opened this issue Nov 4, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@dxyzx0
Copy link

dxyzx0 commented Nov 4, 2020

Thank you for your brilliant work in the paper.

But You consider each atom in the compound and each amino acid in the protein, I wonder whether can I consider the atoms in the protein instead of amino acid?

Since we want to know the interactions between compound and proteins, why we don't consider both the atoms within these 2 structures?

I know that the protein may be very long and the amino acid sequence is already lone enough. However, Can we cut off the protein into much smaller sequence, which contains the interaction pocket? Is there an automatic way to accomplish this task?

Thank you very much!!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant