You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But You consider each atom in the compound and each amino acid in the protein, I wonder whether can I consider the atoms in the protein instead of amino acid?
Since we want to know the interactions between compound and proteins, why we don't consider both the atoms within these 2 structures?
I know that the protein may be very long and the amino acid sequence is already lone enough. However, Can we cut off the protein into much smaller sequence, which contains the interaction pocket? Is there an automatic way to accomplish this task?
Thank you very much!!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your brilliant work in the paper.
But You consider each atom in the compound and each amino acid in the protein, I wonder whether can I consider the atoms in the protein instead of amino acid?
Since we want to know the interactions between compound and proteins, why we don't consider both the atoms within these 2 structures?
I know that the protein may be very long and the amino acid sequence is already lone enough. However, Can we cut off the protein into much smaller sequence, which contains the interaction pocket? Is there an automatic way to accomplish this task?
Thank you very much!!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: