You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Storing [1024 *1024] integer values as BsonArray takes 12 MB while it should take 4MB, and at worst case of 64 bit interpretation 8 MB.
So what is the deal here? There was no warning about the 33% storage efficiency.
There is nothing that suggest that smaller arrays are stored in more efficient way so it is flawed.
So is there a way to store it normally without the massive overhead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Storing [1024 *1024] integer values as BsonArray takes 12 MB while it should take 4MB, and at worst case of 64 bit interpretation 8 MB.
So what is the deal here? There was no warning about the 33% storage efficiency.
There is nothing that suggest that smaller arrays are stored in more efficient way so it is flawed.
So is there a way to store it normally without the massive overhead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: