New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

w/o poses shows better result than w/ poses #6

Open

Jarrome opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Jarrome commented Sep 24, 2024

Hi Philipp,

I just find something strange.

When input GT poses, the relative error becomes even larger.
Please find DeMon, DeepV2D on Kitti and Scannet.

Why given more GT (poses) shows even worse result?
Is that because the GT poses is not as good as the predicted one?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment