-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable almost all tc39 tests #1816
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1816 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 71.58% 71.58%
=======================================
Files 181 181
Lines 13939 13939
=======================================
Hits 9978 9978
Misses 3328 3328
Partials 633 633
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
9898351
to
eaea04d
Compare
Please go commit by commit ;) |
351500b
to
928e730
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
breaking_test_errors.json
is impossible to review 😅, but LGTM otherwise.
Running all of it in ~15m doesn't sound bad considering the scope. Nice work! 👏
for _, path := range pathBasedBlock { // TODO: use trie / binary search? | ||
if strings.HasPrefix(newName, path) { | ||
ctx.t.Run(newName, func(t *testing.T) { | ||
t.Skipf("Skip %s beause of path based block", newName) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
t.Skipf("Skip %s beause of path based block", newName) | |
t.Skipf("Skipped %s because of path based block", newName) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, though I haven't reviewed all of the new errors in any detail... Hopefully we bring them down with further goja updates 🤞
5474050
to
b71ee6d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, though please squash when merging - the fewer copies of the huge JSON file we have in the git history, the better...
b71ee6d
to
97689ae
Compare
git only tracks diffs ... so this is barely a problem, especially given the size of the |
No description provided.