You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
currently blocks are capped at 65K records - i think it might make sense to create larger blocks (perhaps up to half a million or million records) to save on repeated string hashing operations when doing GROUP BY operations in a query.
one way of doing this is creating megablocks: a megablock would be a block consisting of multiple sub-blocks that are fully defined. further thinking required on how to use a megablock to reduce the number of string hash operations required.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
currently blocks are capped at 65K records - i think it might make sense to create larger blocks (perhaps up to half a million or million records) to save on repeated string hashing operations when doing GROUP BY operations in a query.
one way of doing this is creating megablocks: a megablock would be a block consisting of multiple sub-blocks that are fully defined. further thinking required on how to use a megablock to reduce the number of string hash operations required.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: