Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type SimpleSchema changed optional behavior #483

Closed
paulincai opened this issue Apr 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Type SimpleSchema changed optional behavior #483

paulincai opened this issue Apr 8, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@paulincai
Copy link

paulincai commented Apr 8, 2023

This changed somewhere between version 3.2.0 and the current version.

import SimpleSchema from 'simpl-schema'


export const Poi = new SimpleSchema({
  name: String,
  gPlaceId: { type: String, optional: true }
})

const PostSchema = new SimpleSchema({
  userId: String,
  location: { type: Poi, optional: true },
  // ....
})

const myInsertPostSchemaValidationContext = PostSchema.newContext()

console.log(myInsertPostSchemaValidationContext.validate({ userId: '1234' }))

When validating a PostSchema object without a location, I get the error "name" is required (the name of the Poi). It looks like although Poi is optional, all non-optional keys of Poi are required which of course doesn't make sense.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2023

Thank you for submitting an issue!

If this is a bug report, please be sure to include, at minimum, example code showing a small schema and any necessary calls with all their arguments, which will reproduce the issue. Even better, you can link to a saved online code editor example, where anyone can immediately run the code and see the issue.

If you are requesting a feature, include a code example of how you imagine it working if it were implemented.

If you need to edit your issue description, click the [...] and choose Edit.

Be patient. This is a free and freely licensed package that I maintain in my spare time. You may get a response in a day, but it could also take a month. If you benefit from this package and would like to see more of my time devoted to it, you can help by sponsoring.

@herchu
Copy link

herchu commented Jun 22, 2023

I think this is a dup of #475 (I am in the same boat looking for a solution)

@aldeed
Copy link
Collaborator

aldeed commented Feb 26, 2024

Fixed in 3.4.6

@aldeed aldeed closed this as completed Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants