Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] Add PDB → oxDNA file format conversion in OAT #133

Open
Lucandia opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[FEATURE REQUEST] Add PDB → oxDNA file format conversion in OAT #133

Lucandia opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Lucandia
Copy link

Lucandia commented Oct 7, 2024

Hi,

First of all, thank you for developing OAT, it's an excellent tool. While OAT already supports converting oxDNA file formats to PDB, it currently lacks the function to convert PDB files to oxDNA. PDB is a widely-used format, and adding this conversion feature would further streamline the workflow.

Additionally, having PDB → oxDNA conversion available through the scripting interface would make it much easier to integrate this functionality into custom pipelines and automation scripts.

While TacoxDNA does offer PDB → oxDNA conversion, it has not been updated to support the new oxDNA topology format, and it currently lacks a scripting interface.

We already discussed alternative approaches in lorenzo-rovigatti/tacoxDNA#44, but we believe this functionality could be a valuable addition to OAT.

I would be happy to contribute to the implementation if needed!

Thank you so much for your work!

Best,
Luca

@Lucandia Lucandia added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 7, 2024
@ErikPoppleton
Copy link
Collaborator

It shouldn't be too difficult of a task to take the base orientation calculation from Taco and apply it to the OAT monomer data structure so it's easy to write out either topology format. If you're okay with me superseding Taco functionality like that, @lorenzo-rovigatti, I can write it up sometime this week.

@lorenzo-rovigatti
Copy link
Owner

Sure, I'm fine with that. I think it's better to have things streamlines in OAT rather than in a separate package.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants