Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Supress checks on startup #454

Open
rg9400 opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] Supress checks on startup #454

rg9400 opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
area:core issues describing changes to the core of uptime kuma feature-request Request for new features to be added

Comments

@rg9400
Copy link

rg9400 commented Sep 21, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I run Uptime-Kuma in a large compose file with many services. It does not always start first, and it's too complicated to add it as a dependency for every single service. This means that on startup of my host, it notices a lot of containers that have yet to start being down, and then finds them up on the next check, triggering multiple false notifications.

Describe the solution you'd like
An option to suppress the uptime checks on startup of uptime-kuma. Might be helpful to give a configurable amount of time in case it varies by user

Describe alternatives you've considered
Ideally, I would keep uptime-kuma on a separate host so it can actually track when my docker stack is down. However, I still find it useful to find when applications break, so having it within my single stack is useful enough for me.

I can also just live with the false positives on startup

@rg9400 rg9400 added the feature-request Request for new features to be added label Sep 21, 2021
@gaby
Copy link
Contributor

gaby commented Sep 22, 2021

I would suggest putting Uptime-Kuma in a separate compose file. It makes no sense to run the tool in the same compose with services you are monitoring.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:core issues describing changes to the core of uptime kuma feature-request Request for new features to be added
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants