Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure flow for enabling and disabling consent is smooth, defined, and as expected. #58

Open
markhayden opened this issue Nov 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested reevaluate
Milestone

Comments

@markhayden
Copy link
Member

In testing we found that consent can be a bit wonky. Wonky meaning that if I accept consent, and then revoke consent, especially if IDFA is at play some strange things can happen. Let's discuss how we expect this to work and not work to ensure we at minimum have a clear set of guidelines on what to expect.

As an example if I deny "tracking" in the iOS device settings there is no warning or method for letting the user know their experience may be impacted. Maybe this isn't possible on iOS but at a minimum we need to understand the behavior and include it in our formal documentation for customers.

@markhayden markhayden added question Further information is requested critical Priority: Critical labels Nov 16, 2022
@markhayden markhayden added this to the MVP QA milestone Nov 16, 2022
@mgacy
Copy link
Contributor

mgacy commented Nov 16, 2022

The basic process is controlled by Apple and the AppTrackingTransparency framework. If the strange things are an IDFA of 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, that is the expected behavior of ASIdentifierManager.advertisingIdentifier, from which the IDFA is obtained.

@RaeEversmann RaeEversmann added reevaluate and removed critical Priority: Critical labels Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested reevaluate
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants