-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Capture Integration Ids and assign to events #926
feat: Capture Integration Ids and assign to events #926
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a read through with @alexs-mparticle and everything looks clean and pretty straightforward. The tests are comprehensive and verified in his environment that it works.
|
||
describe('Integration Capture', () => { | ||
describe('constructor', () => { | ||
it('should initialize with clickIds as undefined', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I go back and forth with saying this should be undefined vs it being defined with a default value of {}. But not a hill i'm going to die on :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
very minor nits. looks great!
97eeb5d
to
05fc756
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tiny nits
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions |
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.29.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Instructions
development
Summary
Testing Plan
Reference Issue (For mParticle employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)