Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] Set of improvements for LoginAsCustomer modules #29689

Closed
m2-assistant bot opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #29688
Closed

[Issue] Set of improvements for LoginAsCustomer modules #29689

m2-assistant bot opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #29688
Assignees
Labels
Component: LoginAsCustomer Component: LoginAsCustomerAdminUi Component: LoginAsCustomerAssistance Component: LoginAsCustomerFrontendUi Component: LoginAsCustomerPageCache Component: LoginAsCustomerSales Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Progress: done Project: Login as Customer Reported on 2.4.0 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.

Comments

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 19, 2020

This issue is automatically created based on existing pull request: #29688: Set of improvements for LoginAsCustomer modules


Summary (*)

Magento 2.4-develop
PR contains a set of improvements for LoginAsCustomer modules.

  • Replaced around plugin with after
  • Removed redundant code
  • Correctly used isSetFlag instead of (bool)->getValue()

Examples (*)

Proposed solution

@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 14, 2020

Hi @engcom-Delta. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed and removed Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed labels Sep 14, 2020
@engcom-Delta engcom-Delta added Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Sep 14, 2020
@ghost ghost unassigned engcom-Delta Sep 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development label Sep 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Delta
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-37637 were created

Issue Available: @engcom-Delta, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @m2-assistant[bot]. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #29688 by @lbajsarowicz in 2.4-develop branch
Related commit(s):

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.2 release.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch label Sep 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Reported on 2.4.0 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. label Nov 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: LoginAsCustomer Component: LoginAsCustomerAdminUi Component: LoginAsCustomerAssistance Component: LoginAsCustomerFrontendUi Component: LoginAsCustomerPageCache Component: LoginAsCustomerSales Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Progress: done Project: Login as Customer Reported on 2.4.0 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants